5.5 KiB
Mutation Testing for Solidity with Slither (slither-mutate)
{{#include ../../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
Mutation testing "tests your tests" by systematically introducing small changes (mutants) into your Solidity code and re-running your test suite. If a test fails, the mutant is killed. If the tests still pass, the mutant survives, revealing a blind spot in your test suite that line/branch coverage cannot detect.
Key idea: Coverage shows code was executed; mutation testing shows whether behavior is actually asserted.
Why coverage can deceive
Consider this simple threshold check:
function verifyMinimumDeposit(uint256 deposit) public returns (bool) {
if (deposit >= 1 ether) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
}
Unit tests that only check a value below and a value above the threshold can reach 100% line/branch coverage while failing to assert the equality boundary (==). A refactor to deposit >= 2 ether
would still pass such tests, silently breaking protocol logic.
Mutation testing exposes this gap by mutating the condition and verifying your tests fail.
Common Solidity mutation operators
Slither’s mutation engine applies many small, semantics-changing edits, such as:
- Operator replacement:
+
↔-
,*
↔/
, etc. - Assignment replacement:
+=
→=
,-=
→=
- Constant replacement: non-zero →
0
,true
↔false
- Condition negation/replacement inside
if
/loops - Comment out whole lines (CR: Comment Replacement)
- Replace a line with
revert()
- Data type swaps: e.g.,
int128
→int64
Goal: Kill 100% of generated mutants, or justify survivors with clear reasoning.
Running mutation testing with slither-mutate
Requirements: Slither v0.10.2+.
- List options and mutators:
slither-mutate --help
slither-mutate --list-mutators
- Foundry example (capture results and keep a full log):
slither-mutate ./src/contracts --test-cmd="forge test" &> >(tee mutation.results)
- If you don’t use Foundry, replace
--test-cmd
with how you run tests (e.g.,npx hardhat test
,npm test
).
Artifacts and reports are stored in ./mutation_campaign
by default. Uncaught (surviving) mutants are copied there for inspection.
Understanding the output
Report lines look like:
INFO:Slither-Mutate:Mutating contract ContractName
INFO:Slither-Mutate:[CR] Line 123: 'original line' ==> '//original line' --> UNCAUGHT
- The tag in brackets is the mutator alias (e.g.,
CR
= Comment Replacement). UNCAUGHT
means tests passed under the mutated behavior → missing assertion.
Reducing runtime: prioritize impactful mutants
Mutation campaigns can take hours or days. Tips to reduce cost:
- Scope: Start with critical contracts/directories only, then expand.
- Prioritize mutators: If a high-priority mutant on a line survives (e.g., entire line commented), you can skip lower-priority variants for that line.
- Parallelize tests if your runner allows it; cache dependencies/builds.
- Fail-fast: stop early when a change clearly demonstrates an assertion gap.
Triage workflow for surviving mutants
-
Inspect the mutated line and behavior.
- Reproduce locally by applying the mutated line and running a focused test.
-
Strengthen tests to assert state, not only return values.
- Add equality-boundary checks (e.g., test threshold
==
). - Assert post-conditions: balances, total supply, authorization effects, and emitted events.
- Add equality-boundary checks (e.g., test threshold
-
Replace overly permissive mocks with realistic behavior.
- Ensure mocks enforce transfers, failure paths, and event emissions that occur on-chain.
-
Add invariants for fuzz tests.
- E.g., conservation of value, non-negative balances, authorization invariants, monotonic supply where applicable.
-
Re-run slither-mutate until survivors are killed or explicitly justified.
Case study: revealing missing state assertions (Arkis protocol)
A mutation campaign during an audit of the Arkis DeFi protocol surfaced survivors like:
INFO:Slither-Mutate:[CR] Line 33: 'cmdsToExecute.last().value = _cmd.value' ==> '//cmdsToExecute.last().value = _cmd.value' --> UNCAUGHT
Commenting out the assignment didn’t break the tests, proving missing post-state assertions. Root cause: code trusted a user-controlled _cmd.value
instead of validating actual token transfers. An attacker could desynchronize expected vs. actual transfers to drain funds. Result: high severity risk to protocol solvency.
Guidance: Treat survivors that affect value transfers, accounting, or access control as high-risk until killed.
Practical checklist
- Run a targeted campaign:
slither-mutate ./src/contracts --test-cmd="forge test"
- Triage survivors and write tests/invariants that would fail under the mutated behavior.
- Assert balances, supply, authorizations, and events.
- Add boundary tests (
==
, overflows/underflows, zero-address, zero-amount, empty arrays). - Replace unrealistic mocks; simulate failure modes.
- Iterate until all mutants are killed or justified with comments and rationale.
References
- Use mutation testing to find the bugs your tests don't catch (Trail of Bits)
- Arkis DeFi Prime Brokerage Security Review (Appendix C)
- Slither (GitHub)
{{#include ../../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}